UNC to bridge foot traffic?
Student Body President Jasmin Jones questions cost, practicality
Student Body President Jasmin Jones’ administration is at odds with the Board of Trustees over a plan to construct a pedestrian bridge across South Road.
Her administration has cited concerns over the bridge’s cost, practicality, appearance and effect on pedestrian safety. She has tasked a student government committee to gather student opinion and explore the idea more.
Jones’ opposition began this summer with her vote against the approval of the site during a Board of Trustees meeting.
The bridge would span from the southwest corner of the Student Recreation Center to the section of the Pit between Student Stores and the Undergraduate Library.
The board approved the site without Jones’ consent. The design has not yet received approval.
Student Body Vice President David Bevevino said he is concerned about the project’s cost.
“That’s a pretty hefty expenditure,” he said, referring to the estimated $8 million price tag.
Jones said she wants to make sure that the bridge is the best option before committing to the plan.
“I just want to make sure that the bridge is the one and only option that can make South Road safe, but in order to make that kind of decision, I would need to see what options were there,” she said.
Bevevino said he is concerned that the bridge might be underused, citing the crosswalk in front of Student Stores and another in front of the Bell Tower.
“We want to make sure that that’s where the $8 million should go,” he said.
Bevevino said the bridge might make South Road more dangerous for pedestrians.
“We want to make sure that people crossing on the street are safe,” he said. “Are they safer or are they more at risk because the cars will be moving more easily?”
But Bob Winston III, chairman of the Board of Trustees, said the bridge would make South Road safer, especially with the high volume of foot traffic.
“South Road is a very busy dangerous road for pedestrians. The bridge is integral to connecting the two parts of campus over South Road,” he said. “The amount of pedestrian traffic stops vehicle traffic.”
Bevevino said he had reservations about the proposed design of the bridge, which was shown in a July report to the Board of Trustees.
The concept design drawing shows a suspension bridge with a single mast on the south side of the road supporting the curved path.
“There are some concerns that the mast of the bridge might impede the view of the Bell Tower,” he said. “We have to make sure it fits with campus and looks like it belongs there.”
The design, he said, must not obstruct access to the service entrance between Student Stores and the Undergraduate Library.
The Capital Projects task force, a student government group originally intended to give students a voice in the Carolina North project, has recently begun to examine the pedestrian bridge.
The task force will begin gathering students’ opinions in the next couple of weeks.
Contact the University Editor at udesk@unc.edu.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend







We need the bridge
I'm sick of waiting half an hour to get from the IM fields to Columbia Street every afternoon as throngs of pedestrians and rush-hour traffic meet. The bridge will alleviate many of these problems.
Also, the crosswalk is dangerous at night when it is hard to see and pedestrians just walk out into the middle of the road without even looking. Wasn't the justification for being anti-bonfire "how long do we have to wait before someone is killed?" Well, shouldn't the administration be pro-bridge then?
We need the bridge
I'm sick of waiting half an hour to get from the IM fields to Columbia Street every afternoon as throngs of pedestrians and rush-hour traffic meet. The bridge will alleviate many of these problems.
Also, the crosswalk is dangerous at night when it is hard to see and pedestrians just walk out into the middle of the road without even looking. Wasn't the justification for being anti-bonfire "how long do we have to wait before someone is killed?" Well, shouldn't the administration be pro-bridge then? How long do we have to wait until a pedestrian is struck?
thank you Jasmin!
I'm so glad Jasmin is questioning this plan - someone needed to do it!
When I first heard about the proposed bridge, I rolled my eyes. It seemed to be a response to the pedestrian accidents that happened last year... almost like a board member said "Hey, we need to do something to make pedestrians safer... let's build a bridge somewhere." There didn't seem to be much thought past that.
Sure, things get congested when lots of students are crossing the street between classes but considering the state's budget and the amount of time it takes the university to build... well, anything... maybe we should hold on to the 8 million bucks.
Clearly, we need a foot
Clearly, we need a foot bridge from the office of the person who thought this up to the unemployment office.
Bonfires? Bad. Bridges?
Bonfires? Bad. Bridges? Bad. Everything is bad!
$8 Million?
The bridge is entirely unnecessary, too expensive, and generally useless. Why are we even considering it?
Seriously?
Can't some of that money be used for the Studio Art budget which was cut 80% last year??? There are so many other BETTER ways to spend $8 million; I can't believe this was even proposed.
No, it can't be...
I agree that $8m for a bridge seems a bit ridiculous, but is it really? Do you realize that the building being built behind the Stone Center is costing $225 million and the new building where Venable used to be is costing $95 million. Building stuff is expensive. I don't hear people complaining about the $320 million being spent on two buildings that are collectively 40x as expensive as the proposed bridge.
Also, people need to realize the money can't be used elsewhere. The money that would be used for this most likely comes from the $3.1 billion bond that was passed by the citizens of North Carolina for infrastructure improvements back in 2000. That money can only be used for long term capital improvements. Funding the operating expense doesn't fall into that category. The only way to move that money would be for the State Legislature to do something and I imagine overriding voters isn't really what they're willing to do.
I agree with what everyone has said about the location of it. I think it has the potential to negatively impact the area around the Bell Tower and Wilson Library. I don't want to look down Polk Place and see a bridge at the bottom of it.
Fantastic
Another great idea by UNC. Let's spend millions of dollars on a worthless bridge so that we can justify jacking up tuition on out-of-staters...again!
$8 million! For a bridge over
$8 million! For a bridge over South Road?
Do people stop to think anymore about what they're proposing?
Has the capacity to accept stupidity really come to the point where we're building a bridge over a small two-lane road just to potentially save lives/reduce injuries?
The crossing guards are working out just fine as far as controlling traffic. There is really no need for this.